Showing posts with label McKinley Village. Show all posts
Showing posts with label McKinley Village. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

McKinley Village Environmental Impact Study


There will be a city meeting about the upcoming environmental impact study for McKinley Village. It will be Wednesday evening from 5:30 to 7:00 at the Clunie Community Center in McKinley Park (601 Alhambra Boulevard).

As per the document “ Responsible agencies and members of the public are invited to attend and provide input on the scope of the environmental document for the proposed McKinley Village project”. 

The document also states:
"Written comments regarding the relevant issues may be submitted at the meeting” and on the second page it state “written comments or questions concerning the proposed project should be directed to the City’s environmental project manager at the following address by 4:00 pm on June 24, 2013. Please include the contact person’s full name and address:
Dana Allen, Associate Planner
City of Sacramento, Community Development Department
300 Richards Blvd, Third Floor
Sacramento CA 95811
916-808-2762

You can see the full document here

I plan on going to find out what the scope of an Environmental Impact Report is, see the process and I hope to also gain any new insights into the project itself.

I hope to see some of you there. 


I’ve had conversations with several East Sac locals about this project and the reaction to it has been greatly varied. I would love to hear your thoughts on it. Please add a comment here on my blog or email or call me.


Wednesday, June 5, 2013

McKinley Village Meeting Follow Up


I went to the community meeting about McKinley Village last night. It started at 6:30 and didn’t wrap up until 8:30. There was lots of good information, but most of the crowd wanted much more, and they were a very tough crowd! 

I’m glad that I wasn’t one of the people at the front of the room because they had it rough. There was probably 250 people in attendance and almost all of the vocal ones were unhappy. There were several people that spoke out in favor of the project but they were definitely out numbered by the ones with concerns and questions.


What are my take aways from the meeting?

There is a good chance that this site is going to be developed. I talked to the city planning department representative after the meeting and it sounds like there truly is a decent chance of houses going into this site in the next two years.

Despite the local opposition to the plan, this is the best plan that this site has seen and if it is going to be developed (and not into just a large park) 325 houses is much better than a high-rise hotel and office complex or the big box stores that were proposed by other developers in the past.

The application for this development was only made one month ago, so it is still in the very early stages. A traffic study has been started and will take another 8-12 weeks to complete. An Environmental Impact Report has been ordered and that extensive report should be completed in October and up for public review at that point. 

The design is better than I originally thought. They will be doing high earth berms with trees instead of a sound barrier wall, both on the side with the freeway and the railroad tracks. They have placed the houses far enough back from the tacks so they shouldn’t feel any of the vibration of the trains. They are going to have about 40-45 different home designs so it won’t look like a cookie cutter development. The are budgeting much higher build costs for each house (I think it was 40% above their normal build budget) to make sure that they can give them all the character and charm that they will need to appeal to the local expectations, which they know will be very high.


When I look at an average East Sac block, they have about 40-50 houses on each block, depending on the block. If the builders get to build 325 houses, that is the equivalent of 7 to 8 blocks. To give myself an idea of what this looks like in current East Sac reference, there are 332 houses on the blocks of 34th, 35th, Santa Ynez, 36th, 37th, 38th and 39th Streets between H Street and McKinley Boulevard. Surprisingly, this was about the same amount of land with one being .07 square miles (44 acres) and the other being .08 square miles (51 acres).



Do I get a little freaked out about having those new homes added into the neighborhood behind me? Yes, although not as much as my wife does. 

Does it feel better for me to think about it in the terms of 7 more blocks of neighbors behind me? Yes, that doesn’t bother me nearly as much.

Would I rather not have this land developed and not be dragged into this conversation? Yes. Change is hard and I don’t like it and it scares me sometimes. Does this mean that I oppose it? No, I’m still not for or against it yet. 

Would I still have bought my house on Santa Ynez two months ago if I know that this development was going in? You better believe it! The block of Santa Ynez between 39th and McKinley is my favorite block and I don’t think this development will impact that. 

I can respect all the other opinions can concerns about what this means for the neighborhood, but I don’t think it will be a big deal once it is all said and done. It will have a larger impact during construction for the residences on B Street that back up to the tracks or the houses near the entry roads after development, but I think that as you move a few blocks out the impact will be minimal. I may be wrong and there are plenty of people that feel different about the project. 

Only time will tell what will eventually be developed here and what impact it will have. I’ll keep a close eye on it and keep posting about it...



Monday, June 3, 2013

McKinley Village Meetings

Don't forget, if you want to find out all the details on the Mckinley Village project or the latest and greatest info on the progress of the Sutter Park neighborhood you should go to the MENA meeting on Tuesday night at 6:30.

The community meeting is sponsored by MENA and ESIA on June 4th at 6:30pm at the Clunie Auditorium. The presenters will display graphics and answer questions on the proposed development. 

If you want to find out a lot about the project before the meeting, the development company has their shinny new website all set up. Go to http://mckinleyvillage.com to read all about the their plans before the meeting and come prepared with some good questions for them.

See you there!

Wednesday, May 22, 2013

McKinley Village Project on the Table Again in East Sac


Well, once again the 48 acres of land North of East Sac between the Capital City Freeway and the Union Pacific Railroad tracks near Sutter’s Landing Park is being reviewed for development. The current name for the proposed development is the Mckinley Village.



Many residents are getting involved in the conversation and want to know what the impact will be.

Fortunately, there are many ways to find out. I'm not going to try to recreate the wheel with all the thorough journalistic (and some less than journalistic) reporting out there, I'm just going to summarize the facts and point towards the information.

I'm also not going to weigh in for one side or the other just yet. As a resident of East Sac and the McKinley Park neighborhood, I'm very cautious of new development and any increased traffic. As a Realtor, I am always intrigued by new development (a good sign for the economy) and homes for sale. I'll read all the information and go to the meeting and try to slowly form my opinion of this potential development...


According to the Q&A of the developer this would be:
328 single family one and two story homes on a 48-acre lot. Homes will range in size from approximately 1,250 square feet with three bedrooms and 2.5 bathrooms to approximately 2,500 square feet with five bedrooms and four bathrooms. Some of the homes will feature an option for second units, and others will have a master bedroom on the ground floor. This will be a $130 million development and they would expected the homes to sell from $300,000 to $600,000 plus.

Access to the Mckinley Village development for cars, bike, and pedestrian would be through A and 28th Streets in Midtown, and via an under-crossing of the UnionPacific Railroad tracks that connects through the Cannery Business Park to C Street between 40th Street and Tivoli Way in the McKinley Park neighborhood. There will also be a bike and pedestrian under-crossing of the Union Pacific Railroad tracks at B Street and Alhambra Boulevard in the McKinley Park neighborhood



Mckinley Village would also include 2.9 acres of park land, which will require that RCI (the developer) pay maintenance fees to the Park and Recreation Department. There will be over 2,000 trees and an additional 3.26 arches of common green space.

Here are the links to the most informative articles that I have found:
A detailed article in The Sacrament Bee

The developers Q&A document
Brochure
Illustration
Plans

Several articles in the Sacramento Press



And an article in the East Sac News


There are two upcoming meetings that I plan on attending to find out more about the development and participate in the conversation.

A community meeting sponsored by MENA and ESIA on June 4th at 6:30pm at the Clunie Auditorium. The presenters will display graphics and answer questions on the proposed development. Other local development projects will be displaying materials and answering questions at the meeting as well.

The Sacramento Old City Association is organizing a public forum on Mckinley Village on June 8 at the Midtown Village Cafe (1827 I St, Sacramento, CA 95811). The event begins on at 9:00 AM so you better show up early to get your coffee and a chair!


This might be an interesting one to follow like the project at Curtis Park Village that has taken years to get off the ground. Then again it might not even get close to becoming anything and just stay an empty field for the next several decades with the occasional resident living under a blue tarp against that chain link fence seen from the highway...